Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29958 (AP)

PEDADA JANAKAMMA v. BOGINENI SUJATHA

CRP/1641/2022 · 2025-07-31

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010430102022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1641/2022 Between: 1. PEDADA JANAKAMMA, W/O LATE SURYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED 66 YEARS, R/AT D.NO.38-16-15/2, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. SANAPALA MAHESWARI, W/O LATE APPALAKONDA, HINDU, AGED 53 YEARS, R/AT D.NO.38-16-15/2, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, 3. NAMBALA PUSHPAVATHI, W/O SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED 51 YEARS, R/AT D.NO.38-16-15/2, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. NAMBALA SATYAVATHI, W/O VENKATA RAMANA, HINDU, AGED 46 YEARS, R/AT D.NO.38-16-15/2, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. PEDADA GOVINDA, S/O LATE SURYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED 44 YEARS, R/AT D.NO.38-16-15/2, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. PADADA RAMU, S/O LATE SURYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O, D.NO.38-16-15/2, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. BOGINENI SUJATHA, W/O SUBBA RAO, CHOWDARY, HINDU, AGED 41 YEARS, R/AT D.NO.58-22-34/6, SUSARLA COLONY, BUTCHIRAJUPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM 2. SUVVARI VASUDEVAMMA, S/O LATE SYAMALA RAO, HINDU, AGED 60 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO.B-1, AMBA APARTMENTS, CBM COMPOUND,VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. DUPPALA VENKATA KOTESWARA RAO, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED 43 YEARS, R/AT. D.NO.10-1-31, MEHER NAGAR, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. BODDEPALLI SATYANARAYANA, S/O CHINNODU, HINDU, R/AT D.NO. 44- 34-54/2, NANDAGIRI NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEIN, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside the Common Order dated 30.06.2022 passed in I.A No. 220 of 2022 in O.S.No. 494 of 2022 on the file of the III Additional Junior Civil Judge at Visakapatnam and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of common order dt. 30.06.2022 passed in I.A.No. 220 of 2022 in O.S.No. 494 of 2014 file on the file of the III Additional Junior Civil Judge at Visakhapatnam, in the above CRP and pass 3 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S.V.S.S.SIVA RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A S C BOSE 4 The Court made the following order: It is represented by the counsel for the petitioners that, the cause in the instant Civil Revision Petition does not survive. 2. The said submission is placed on record. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR Dt.01.08.2025 DSB 5 199 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CRP No.1641 of 2022 Date 01.08.2025 U DSB