Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29957 (AP)

ATC Telecom Infrastructure Private Limited, v. .The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/26083/2021 · 2025-10-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010429682021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 26083/2021 Between: 1. ATC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,IV FLOOR, GOWRA PLAZA, DOOR NO.1-8-304-307/381/444, SP ROAD, BEGUMPET, SECUNDERABAD, TELANGANA- 500003 REP. BY ITS CIRCLE HEAD, SRI NOMULA PRASAD ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, ANDHRA PRADESH-522237. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YELAMANCHILI RURAL POLICE STATION, YELAMANCHILI, VISAKHAPATNAM-531055. 3. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, YELAMANCHILI MUNICIPALITY, YELAMANCHILI, VISAKHAPATNAM-531055. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not providing Police protection for erection of Ground Based Tower in Survey No.35-5, situated at Ramnagar area, Ward No.19, Yelamanchili, Municipality and Mandal Visakhapatnam District, A.P. as per the permission granted by the 3rd Respondent by considering the petitioner Application dt.19.03.2021, as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of settled principles of Natural justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T S MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. In that view, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 26083 of 2021 14.10.2025 Mjl /*