[2025:RJ-JP:447] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 6062/2024 1. Anita Chetni Wife Of Shri Amit Gupta, R/o B-228-10B, Scheme Gopalpura Bypass Jaipur Rajasthan. 2. Daksh Agrawal Son Of Shri Amit Gupta, R/o B-228-10B, Scheme Gopalpura Bypass Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Learned Public Prosecutor. 2. Mrs. Chandni Wife Of Mr. Nitin Maheshwari, R/o B43, Basant Bahar Colony, Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohammed Shoaib Mirza, Adv. with Mr. Sameer Hussain, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 03/01/2025 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., the petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer for quashing of the FIR No.470/2024 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 333 and 115(2) of B.N.S. 2. As per the brief facts of the case, on 05.08.2024, an FIR bearing registration No.470/2024 was lodged by the complainant- respondent at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 333 and 115(2) of B.N.S. During pendency of this matter, both the parties have entered into compromise and amicably settled their dispute. [2025:RJ-JP:447] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-6062/2024] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that both the parties have entered into compromise and have settled their dispute amicably and therefore, prayed that the present petition be allowed and the criminal proceedings arising out of the FIR No.470/2024 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur City (East) be quashed and set aside. 4. On 04.12.2024, the Coordinate Bench of this Court directed both the parties to appear before the Investigating Officer for verification of compromise and after investigation, the Investigating Officer was further directed to submit verification report along with the case diary on the next date of hearing. 5. Today, learned Public Prosecutor has produced the factual report dated 16.12.2024 submitted by SHO, Police Station Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur City (East), in which it has been mentioned that both the parties have settled their dispute amicably and the complainant does not want to prosecute the matter. The factual report dated 16.12.2024 is taken on record. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 7. In view of the aforesaid and considering the fact that the parties have resolved their disputes amicably and also considering that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604], the FIR is liable to be quashed. [2025:RJ-JP:447] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-6062/2024] 8. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.470/2024 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur City (East) is quashed and set aside as well as the other criminal proceedings arising out of the same are also quashed and set aside on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. Consequence to follow. 9. The stay application also stands disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /504