Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29953 (ALL)

AJIT KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/23635/2023 · 2025-08-20

Samit Gopal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23635 of 2023 Applicant :- Ajit Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Azhar Hussain,Sunil Kumar Pandey,Tahira Shabnam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Santosh Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application despite the fact that there are three learned counsels appearing on behalf of the applicant. Sri Triveni Saran Rai, learned counsel for the State is present. Sri Santosh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the first informant is also not present even when the matter has been taken up in the revised list. 2. This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant-Ajit Kumar, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 17 of 2020, u/s 304-B, 498-A, 201 IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at Police Station Suhaval, District Ghazipur. 3. This is a second bail application. The first bail application on behalf of the applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated 17.8.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.29461 of 2021. 4. Since there is no representation from the side of the applicant, the present bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Pending application (s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 21.8.2025 Gaurav Kuls Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad