Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29952 (KAR)

SMT KANCHANA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18168/2022 · 2025-03-17

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11830 WP No. 18168 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 18168 OF 2022 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: 1. SMT KANCHANA, W/O CHELUVARAJ, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, PROPRIETOR OF KANCHANA ENTERPRISES, RESIDING AT NO.391, 3RD CROSS, KEMPEGOWDA LAYOUT, LAGGERE, BANGALORE- 560 058. 2. SRI. SRINIVASAIAH, S/O PUTTASWAMAIAH.R AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, PROPRIETOR OF SREERANGA ENTERPRISES, RESIDING AT NO. 24/B AROGYA BADAVANE ANNAPOORNESHWARINAGARA SHRGANDHADA COLONY, BANGALORE-560 091. 3. SRI. S VENKATESHWARALU S/O LATE SANJEEVA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS PROPREITOR OF SIDDHARTHA ENTERPRISES RESIDING AT NO. 43, 1ST CROSS, KUMBARAGUNDI BADAVANE, J.C. ROAD CROSS, BANGALORE -560 002. 4. SRI MUNIRAJU S/O POOJAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS PROPRIETOR OF VIJAYALAKSHMI GARBAGE SERVICE Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11830 WP No. 18168 of 2022 RESIDING AT NO. 855/B, BAHUBALINAGARA JALAHALLI VILLAGE, BANGALORE- 560 013. 5. SRI. L.N MANJUNATHA S/O LAKSHMINARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 82, NARASIMHAIANAYAPALYA, MAGADI MAIN RAOD, BANGALORE- 560 091. 6. SRI. KUMARESH S/O LATE LAKSHMAN AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS PROPRIETOR OF L.R. ENTERPRISES RESIDING AT NO.61 L.C.R.SCHOOL, GOKULA 1ST STAGE, BANGALORE- 560 054. 7. SRI. LINGARAJU S/O HOMBALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS PROPRIETOR OF MUNESHWARASWAMY ENTERPRISES, RESIDING AT NO. 70 2ND 'H' MAIN ROAD, NAGARABHAVI 11TH BLOCK, BANGALORE- 560 072. 8. SMT. NAGADEVI W/O REDANNA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS PROPRIETOR OF VENKATESHWRA ENTERPRISES, R/T NO. 36, 8TH CROSS, SUNANDAGUDI COLONY, NEAR RAILWAY TRACK, YESHWANTHPUR, BANGALORE-560 022. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.B.MUKKANNAPPA, ADVOCATE) - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11830 WP No. 18168 of 2022 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE- 560 001. 2. THE CHIEF COMMISIONER, BBMP, NR SQUARE, CORPORATE CIRCLE, BANGALORE- 560 002. 3. THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER (HEALTH), BBMP NR SQUARE, CORPORATION CIRCLE, BANGALORE- 560 002. 4. THE CHIEF HEALTH OFFICER, BBMP, NR SQUARE, CORPORATION, BANGALORE- 560 002. 5. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER ( MAHADEVAPURA), BBMP, WHITEFIELD ROAD, RHB COLONY BANGALORE- 560 048. 6. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER(BOMMANAHALLI), BBMP, NO.29, 2ND FLOOR, HSR BDA COMPLEX, 12TH MAIN ROAD, 6TH SECTOR,HSR LAYOUT, BANGALORE- 560 102. 7. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER (YELAHANKA) BBMP, YELAHANKA ZONE, BANGALORE- 560 042. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:11830 WP No. 18168 of 2022 8. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER(RR NAGAR), BBMP, IDEAL HOMES TOWNSHIP R.R. NAGARA, BANGALORE- 560 098. 9. THE HEALTH OFFICER, BBMP, MAHADEVPURA ZONE WHITEFIELD ROAD, RHB COLONY, BANGALORE- 560 048. 10. THE HEALTH OFFICER, BBMP, BOMMANAHALLI ZONE, NO. 29, 2ND FLOOR, HSR BDA COMPLEX, 12TH MAIN RAOD, 6TH SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT, BANGALORE- 560 102. 11. THE HEALTH OFFICER, BBMP, YELAHANKA ZONE, BANGALORE- 560 042. 12. THE HEALTH OFFICER, BBMP, R.R. NAGARA ZONE IDAL HOMES TOWNSHIP R.R. NAGARA BANGALORE- 560 098. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1, SMT. SINCHANA M R., ADVOCATE FOR C/R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED TENDER NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.BBMP/MM/AKA/PR/123/2022- 23 DTD 22.07.2022 AT ANNEXURE-R ISSUED BY THE R9 and QUASH THE IMPUGNED TENDER NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.AKA/BOMMANAHALLI/PR/06/2022-23 DTD 25.07.2022 ISSUED BY THE R10 AT ANNEXURE-R1 TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC., - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:11830 WP No. 18168 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition is rendered infructuous by efflux of time. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed as having become infructuous. Consequently, pending IAs. stand disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE BK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 136