Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29951 (RAJ)

NAMITA GOYAL D/O SHRI SUDHIR KUMAR GOYAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/14855/2024 · 2025-02-19

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:7335] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14855/2024 Namita Goyal D/o Shri Sudhir Kumar Goyal, aged about 27 Years, R/o III-D-10, Govt. Multistories Flat, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary College Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Commissioner, College Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Ms. Sheelu Mittal, D/o Parentage Not Known, Working As Guest Faculty On The Post Of Assistant Professor Under Vidhya Sambal Scheme, Through Commissioner, College Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vigyan Shah-AAG Mr. Shubhendra Singh Mr. Naman Dadhich JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 19/02/2025 1. After arguing the matter for some time, counsel for the petitioner submits that a liberty be granted to the petitioner for submitting a representation before the respondents with regard to redressal of her grievance. Counsel for the petitioner further submits respondents be directed to pass a speaking order on the same, expeditiously as early as possible. 2. Counsel for the respondents has no objection. 3 The instant writ petition stands disposed of with the liberty aforesaid. [2025:RJ-JP:7335] (2 of 2) [CW-14855/2024] 4. In case, any representation is submitted by the petitioner within a period of one month from today, it is expected from the authority to decide the same expeditiously, as early as possible, strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/205