Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29951 (AP)

M/s. Munimohan Reddy and Co., v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/22512/2025 · 2025-08-28

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010430232025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 22512/2025 Between: 1. M/S. MUNIMOHAN REDDY AND CO.,, REP.BY MANAGING PARTNER, I.MUNIMOHAN REDDY, S/O. CHANGAL RAYAREDDY, AGE . 62 YEARS, OCC. SPECIAL CLASS CONTRACTOR, R/O. PLOT NO.500, BYRAGA PATTEDA, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT - 517 501. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFARE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH MEDICAL SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR/VICECHAIRMAN, ANDHRA PRADESH MEDICAL SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH MEDICAL SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, TIRUPATHI, CHITOOR DISTRICT. 5. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH MEDICAL SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DIVISION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri P. Anand Surya, learned Counsel representing Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the payment has been received by the Writ Petitioner after filing the present Writ Petition. He would submit that no further consideration is required. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the above submission. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 29.08.2025 DSV 95 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 22512/2025 29.08.2025 DSV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 22512/2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 01 29.08.2025 GRKP, J Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV