Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29947 (RAJ)

SMT. BABLI W/O SHRI VIRENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15160/2019 · 2025-03-06

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:10289] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15160/2019 Smt. Babli W/o Shri Virendra Singh, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Ganesh Nagar, Behind Cold Storage, Sewar Road, Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through Principal Secretary, Social Justice and Empowerment Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director, Social Justice and Empowerment Department, 22, Raj Bhawan Road, Ambedkar Nagar, Civil Lines, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The Deputy Director, Social Justice and Empowerment Department, Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manish Bhardwaj for Mr. Nalin G. Narain JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 06/03/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer to the payment of minimum pay scale. Counsel submits that the petitioner wants to submit a representation before the respondent-authorities in the light of the order passed by this Court in the case of Anokha Bai vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.372/2013 decided on 25.04.2017. Counsel submits that the respondents be further directed to decide the representation of the petitioner, expeditiously, as early as possible. [2025:RJ-JP:10289] (2 of 2) [CW-15160/2019] 2. Counsel for the respondents has no objection if such direction is issued. 3. In view of above, the instant petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file the representation before the respondent-authorities. The respondents are directed to decide the present case in the light of the judgment passed in the case of Anokha Bai (supra), if applicable, considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, and thereafter, passed a reasoned and speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. 4. Stay application as well as all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J GARIMA /81