1 2025:CGHC:46966 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5598 of 2023 Prabhu Dayal Sahu S/o - Late Guman Singh Sahu Aged About 65 Years Assistant Samiti Prabandhak, Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Khurshipar, Tehsil Dongargaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Co- Operative, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Post Office Rakhi, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Additional Registrar Co-Operative Societies, Chhattigarh Off. Vivekanand Complex Pension Bada, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Registrar Co-Operative Societies, Chhattigarh, Off. Vivekanand Complex Pension Bada, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Assistant Registrar Co-Operative Societies, Rajnandgaon, Off. - Collectorate Premises, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 5 - Samiti Prabandhak Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Khurshipar, Tah- Dongargaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For State : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 12.09.2025 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition even in two rounds. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.09.15 18:33:01 +0530 2 2. Mr. Devesh G. Kela, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State, is present. 3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following prayers:- “i. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to release all the dues e.g. salary, pension, gratuity, GPF, etc. with all consequential benefits along with the interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of his actual entitlement. ii. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 4. Today, when the case is called, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present nor any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition on repeated calls and it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter, as such this Court has left with no other option, but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh