- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1513 WP No. 15642 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 15642 OF 2020 (GM-CFA) BETWEEN: Y.H.ANANDA S/O. HANUMANTHAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.1/1, 3RD CROSS, JAYANAGAR, 6TH BLOCK, YEDIYUR, OPP. MM M/S BRIGADE, BENGALURU-560 082. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GEORGE ANTHONY CRUZ., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BENGALURU REGION, SAHAKARA BHAVAN, MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003. 2. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CHITS-III, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003. 3. M/S. SURABHI CHITS LTD., NO.270, 2ND FLOOR, SAI RAM COMPLEX, BHUVANESHWARINAGAR MAIN ROAD, 100 FEET RING ROAD, 5TH BLOCK, KATRIGUPPE, BSK 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU-560 085, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1513 WP No. 15642 of 2020 REPRESENTED BY SENIOR MANAGER AND GPA HOLDER: S.V.PRASAD. 4. Y.H.JANARDHANA S/O. HANUMANTHAPPA REDDY, MAJOR IN AGE, R/AT NO. 278, 25TH CROSS, 6TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 082. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS KUMAR.M., HCGP FOR R1 & 2; SRI. T.P.VIVEKANANDA., ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Srinivas Kumar., HCGP for respondents 1 and 2 and Sri.T.P.Vivekananda., counsel for respondent No.3 have appeared in person. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2020. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending from five years. As already noted - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1513 WP No. 15642 of 2020 above, though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 17