Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:22818 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (C). No. 1169 of 2024
----------
1. Ranjeet Kumar, son of Banke Mohan Prasad, resident of Hospital Chowk, Chainpur, P.O. Chainpur, P.S. Chainpur, District Palamau, Jharkhand.
2. Touhid Khan, son of late Abdul Sattar Khan, resident of Hospital Chow, P.O. Chainpur, P.S. Chainpur, District Palamau, Jharkhand.
………. Petitioners Versus
1. State of Jharkhand
2. Praveen Kumar Toppo, Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi.
3. Bal Kishun Munda, Commissioner, Palamau, Police Line, Daltonganj, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamau, Daltonganj.
4. Shashi Ranjan, Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamau, Daltonganj.
5. Anil Kumar Singh, Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Palamau, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamau, Daltonganj.
………. Opp. Parties. ----------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
----------- For the Petitioner s : Mr. Mukul Kr. Singh, Advocate
Mr. Gyan Prakash Tiwari, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Md. Shahabuddin, SC-VII
---------- 03/ 08.08.2025 Learned counsel for the opposite parties relies upon the order passed in Civil Appeal No(s). 13950-13951 of 2024 and submits that entire advertisement issued by respondent No. 4 dated 29.07.2010 has been quashed in totality and as such nothing survives in this contempt case.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners does not object the aforesaid contention.
3. Accordingly, the instant contempt application stands dismissed as infructuous.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) kunal/-