IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 1020/2025 Decided on: 29.05.2026 Chaman Lal …..Petitioner Versus State of H. P. & Ors. ......Respondents ………………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: None. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Mr. Satish Kumar, Dy. Ranger Chamba, present in person. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Though, the matter has been called twice, however, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a cheque drawn in the name of the petitioner in the sum of Rs.5,000/- towards the cost imposed upon the respondents vide order dated 18.05.2026. In view of the non-availability of learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Advocate General submits that the cost, in terms of the order dated 18.05.2026, shall be deposited in the bank 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 account of the petitioner available with the respondents-Department within the next two weeks. Statement is taken note of. 3. Respondents have filed the compliance affidavit. With the assistance of learned Additional Advocate General, I have seen the compliance affidavit and also the speaking order passed by the respondents on 23.05.2026 (Annexure R-1) deciding petitioner’s case. 4. In view of the compliance affidavit and the consideration order passed by the respondents, the instant petition is disposed of. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 29th May, 2026 (rohit)