Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29938 (RAJ)

VARUN PRAKASH ARYA v. STATE OF RAJ AND ANR

CW/21224/2017 · 2025-01-31

Inderjeet Singh, Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4424-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21224/2017 Varun Prakash Arya S/o Ganga Ram Arya, R/o 825, Sector 11, Chopasani Housing Board, Jodhpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 2. Sub-Inspector And Investigating Officer, Police Station - Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur- South, Jaipur. 3. First Leasing Company Of India Ltd., Through Its Official Liquidator, High Court Of Madras, Corporate Bhavan Ii Floor No. 29, Rajaji Salai, Chennai. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Kumar Singh with Mr. Vagish Kumar Singh and Mr. Anupam Bhargava For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Sharma Saraswat with Mr. Sahil Parashar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 31/01/2025 This amended writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “ a) By way of appropriate writ, order or direction direct the respondent-state to take appropriate steps to investigate, prosecute and punish respondent no.3, its directors, employees, auditors or any other persons who have committed offences under the Indian Penal [2025:RJ-JP:4424-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-21224/2017] Code or any other law in re-misappropriation of monies, fraud, forgery arising out of the conduct of business of the respondent no.3. b) By way of appropriate writ, order or direction direct the respondent-state to disclose before this Hon’ble Court as to what steps have been taken to recover monies invested by Public Trusts-Rajasthan State Electricity Employees Superannuation Fund Trust, Rajasthan State Electricity Employees CPF Trust, Rajasthan State Electricity Employees General Provident Fund Trust and Rajasthan State Electricity Employees Gratuity Trust in the respondent no.3-Accused Company. C) Issue any other writ, order or directions to which the petitioner may be entitled to in facts and circumstances of the case” Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3 submits that the company is under liquidation and the official liquidator has been appointed in this matter by the Hon’ble Madras High Court. In that view of the matter, we disposed of this writ petition with liberty to the affected person to approach before the official liquidator with regard to their grievance, if any. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Arun Bathla /77