IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No. 338 of 2012 Date of decision: 05.12.2025 ________________________________________________ Tanuj Sharma .....Appellant Versus Pawan Kumar …..Respondent ________________________________________________ Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the appellant: None for the appellant. For the respondent: Mr. Aditya Chouhan, Advocate. Sushil Kukreja, Judge Court notice issued to the appellant has been received back duly served, however, there is no representation on his behalf. 2. The present appeal has been filed against the judgment of acquittal dated 30.04.2012, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P., in a complaint case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 3. Today, the case has been called repeatedly, however, none has appeared on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested to pursue the case. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, for want of 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 5th December, 2025 (raman) 2