APHC010430242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22066/2025 Between: 1. PATHAN BHASHA KHAN, S/O. LATE SRI PATAN HYDER KHAN, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/O. 864/2, DEVANDLAPALLI, JILLELLAMANDHA, KAMBHAMVARIPALLE, PAIEMGADDA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, NOWANNAMAIAH DISTRICT-517214. 2. P. MUNTHAJ BI, W/O. PATHAN BHASHA KHAN, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/O. 864/2, DEVANDLAPALLI, JILLELLAMANDHA, KAMBHAMVARIPALLE, PAIEMGADDA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, NOWANNAMAIAH DISTRICT-517214. 3. PATAN NAZEEROON, W/O. JABIULLA, R/O. 3/34-A, RAYAVARAM KASPA, T. SUNDUPALLE MANDAL, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT-516129 NOW ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT. . 4. SHAIK THAHARUN BI, W/O. S.SAYED SAB VALI, R/O. 12-129, YARRAIAHGARIPALLI, KAKAKADA, KALAKADA TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517236, NOW ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAYACHOTI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, T.SUNDUPALLI POLICE STATION, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SYED KHADER MASTAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.3 in frequently calling the Petitioners to the Police Station without following due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently to direct Respondent No.3 not to interfere with the lives and liberties of the Petitioners, without following due process of law.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 being Accused Nos.2 and 3 in Crime No.108 of 2025 of T.Sundupalli Police Station, were called to the Police Station to serve notices under Sections 23(3) of BNSS and Petitioner Nos.3 and 4 are no way concerned with the said crime. 3. Sri Syed Khader Mastan, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to call the Petitioner Nos.3 and 4 to the Police Station, in the absence of any crime registered against them. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:28.08.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.22066 of 2025 Dt.28.08.2025 Dinesh