IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Dhanpal State of Haryana and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Rohan Moudgil, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the case of the petitioner is covered against the petitioner by a recent judgment of this Court dated 29.04.2025 others Vs. State of Haryana and others In the light of above, the present petition is also d terms of Rajbir May 19, 2025 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.125 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5576 Date of Decision : Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Rohan Moudgil, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional A.G., Haryana. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the case of the petitioner is covered against the petitioner by a recent judgment of dated 29.04.2025 passed in CWP others Vs. State of Haryana and others’. In the light of above, the present petition is also d Rajbir’s case (supra). (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE 5 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 5576-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 19.05.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Rohan Moudgil, Advocate for A.G., Haryana. Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the case of the petitioner is covered against the petitioner by a recent judgment of CWP-11655 of 2025 ‘Rajbir and In the light of above, the present petition is also dismissed in DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.05.22 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document