Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29932 (AP)

Shaik Mohammed Arif v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/20733/2019 · 2025-09-21

B V L N Chakravarthi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010429882019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 20733/2019 Between: 1. SHAIK MOHAMMED ARIF, S/O MD AMEER AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 18-194/20, DWARAKA NAGAR, VELGODE VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT- 518533. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, 4TH FLOOR, B BLOCK, VTPS ROAD, BHIMARAJU GUTTA IBRAHIMPATNAM 521456. 3. AP SAMAGRA SIKSHA ABHIYAN, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, KURNOOL KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M SRIKANTH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.20733 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not allowing the amendment to the application submitted by the Petitioner and considering his earlier experience in NGOs and awarding weightage marks for the same as per the rules issued in G.O.Ms.No.24, dt.15.02.2019 as amended in G.O.Ms.No.31, dt.06.05.2019 as arbitrary and illegal and further declare that the is entitled to weightage marks as per the amended rules issued in G.O.Ms.No.31, dt.06.05.2019 and to pass…” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is not coming forward to give instructions to prosecute the matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 22.09.2025 Pmk 3 12 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:20733 OF 2019 Date: 22.09.2025 Pmk