HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18550/2018 Murari Lal S/o Late Smt. Ramkatori D/o Laxman Singh, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 11, Rajakheda, Distt. Dholpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Ramprakash S/o Ramcharan, Resident Of Hall Abad Village Bhagwanpur, Tehsil Rajakheda, Distt. Dholpur. 2. Ramniwas S/o Ramcharan, Resident Of Hall Abad Village Bhagwanpur, Tehsil Rajakheda, Distt. Dholpur. 3. Vidhyawati D/o Ramcharan, W/o Hariom Sharma, Resident Of Village Water Works Ki Tanki, Pinahar, Distt. Agra, U.p. 4. Jaya Devi D/o Ramcharan W/o Shanti Sharma, Resident Of Village Water Works Ki Tanki, Pinahar, Distt. Agra, U.p. 5. Vasudevi D/o Ramcharan W/o Shivram, Resident Of Village Water Works Ki Tanki, Pinahar, Distt. Agra, U.p. 6. Mithlesh D/o Ramcharan W/o Ramshankar Sharma, Resident Of Village Viprawali, Pinahar, Distt. Agra, U.p. 7. Ramdulari D/o Fateh Singh W/o Harprasad, Resident Of Village Panchay, Hall Abad Village Bhagwanpur, Tehsil Rajakheda, Distt. Dholpur. 8. Government Of Rajasthan Through Tehsildar, Rajakheda, Distt. Dholpur. 9. Bank Of India Through Manager, Rajakheda, Dist. Dholpur. 10. Chakodilal @ Krishan Murari S/o Late Smt. Ramkatori D/o Laxman Singh, Resident Of Ward No. 11, Rajakheda, Distt. Dholpur. 11. Pooram S/o Late Smt. Ramkatori D/o Laxman Singh, Resident Of Ward No. 11, Rajakheda, Distt. Dholpur. (2 of 3) [CW-18550/2018] 12. Geeta D/o Late Smt. Ramkatori W/o Sh. Lalit Kumar, Resident Of Village Maharajpur, Tehsil Fatehbad, Distt. Agra, State U.p. 13. Ramshankar S/o Daalchand, Resident Of Village Ranchorpur, Tehsil Rajakheda, Distt. Dholpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 29/04/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 06.07.2018 passed by the Board of Revenue, by which the revision petition submitted against the order dated 08.03.2018 passed by the Sub- Divisional Officer has been rejected and the application filed by the petitioner for taking document i.e. ‘Panda Bahi’ on the record has been rejected. 2. Perusal of the record indicates that during pendency of the suit, an application was submitted for summoning and taking ‘Panda Bahi’ on the record with regard to factum of death of Laxman Singh. 3. The Court below have rejected the said application in the light of the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 looking to the fact that ‘Panda Bahi’ is not public document, hence, the same cannot be taken on record. A just, cogent and reasoned order has been passed by the Court below, which requires no interference of this Court. (3 of 3) [CW-18550/2018] 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands rejected. They stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand rejected. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/70