1 2025:CGHC:17845 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3563 of 2022 1 - Smt. Chandrabhaga W/o Baboolal Soni Aged About 80 Years Through The Power Of Attorney Holder - Onkar Soni , S/o Baboolal Soni, Aged About 45 Years, R/o G.E. Road, Rajnandgaon, Tahsil And Distt. - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh (Now Dead). ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur , Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 4 - Tahsildar Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 5 - Revenue Inspector Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 6 - Patwari Ph No. 36/24, Korinbhata, Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 7 - Chairman Prakash Grih Nirman Samiti, Rathore Electrical, Hamalpara, Rajnandgaon Tashil And District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.04.24 14:09:02 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Aditya Bhardwaj, Advocate For State/Respondent/s : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 21/04/2025 1. Heard Mr. Aditya Bhardwaj, counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer for the State /respondent/s. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the original petitioner has expired, however, he submits that the matter relates to demarcation of the land, instead of filing of several applications for demarcation of land, the same has not been decided. 3. The above facts has not been opposed by the learned counsel for the State/respondents. 4. Since, the petitioner has expired, learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file appropriate application through legal heirs of the petitioner in respect of demarcation of the land and inturn, if such an application is filed within 15 days along with the copy of this order, then the respondent authorities specially the respondent No.4/Tehsildar, Rajnandgaon is directed to consider the same and to decide the same in respect of demarcation of land in accordance with law within a further period of 30 days. 3 5. It is made clear the this Court has not made any opinion in the merits of this case and the authority concerned are at liberty to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law after taking due care of the documents filed by the petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation(s) and direction(s), the present petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi