IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.595 of 2025 Date of Decision: 17.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Pawan Kumar …….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate Generals. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Careful perusal of the reply filed by the respondents clearly reveals that the pay of the petitioner has been protected in terms of the mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated and as such, no action of the respondents can be said to be contemptuous. 2. Consequently, in view of the above, the present petition is disposed of. Notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged accordingly. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law qua the surviving grievance, if any. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 17, 2025 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?