Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29913 (MAD)

J.Ravi v. Dr.B.Chandra Mohan, IAS and Another

CONT P/824/2025 · 2025-04-08

C Saravanan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Contempt Petition No.824 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 08.04.2025 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN Contempt Petition No.824 of 2025 Mr.J.Ravi ...Petitioner Versus 1.Dr.B.Chandra Mohan, IAS, State of Tamil Nadu, Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2.Dr.V.C.Rameswaramurugan, The Member Secretary, Teachers Recruitment Board, College Road, Chennai – 600 006. ...Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the 1st and 2nd Respondent herein for not complying the common order passed by this Court dated 25.09.2024 in W.P.No.16559 of 2024 by willful disobedience under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Contempt Petition No.824 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.M.Padmanaban For Respondents : Mr.R.Neelakandan, Additional Advocate General – VIII Assisted by Mr.E.Kathiravan, Senior Counsel ORDER This Contempt Petition arises out of the order dated 25.09.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.16559 of 2024. 2. The learned Additional Advocate General – VIII for the Respondents submitted that pursuant to the order dated 25.09.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.16559 of 2024, the 2nd Respondent has issued the proceedings dated 05.11.2024 bearing Moo.Mu.No.7888/A/E1/2021 and thereby, the direction issued by this Court in the order dated 25.09.2024 in W.P.No.16559 of 2024 has been duly complied by the 2nd Respondent. The learned Additional Advocate General – VIII produced a copy of the said proceedings issued by the 2nd Respondent before this Court. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Contempt Petition No.824 of 2025 3. The above submission made by the learned Additional Advocate General – VIII for the Respondents has been fairly conceded by the learned counsel for the Petitioner. 4. Recording the submissions so made by the learned counsel on either side, this Contempt Petition is closed and the Respondents are discharged from the contempt proceedings. 08.04.2025 mrr Index : Yes/No 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Contempt Petition No.824 of 2025 C.SARAVANAN, J. mrr Contempt Petition No.824 of 2025 08.04.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis