IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1991 of 2025 Date of Decision: 17.11.2025 _______________________________________________________ Sh. Rajesh Kumar Thakur …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Nikhil Katwal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 15.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Under Secretary (Education) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith copy of notification dated 14.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Secretary Education to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Anish Banshtu, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that respondents, after having considered the representation of the petitioner, have transferred him from GSSS Bhat Ki Dhar, District 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Mandi to GSSS Sidhyani, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, against vacancy. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, who is in receipt of afore documents, fairly acknowledges factum with regard to compliance. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge November 17, 2025 (sunil)