APHC010429252025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22359/2025 Between: 1. MALLU SURENDRA REDDY, S/O. MALLU NAGI REDDY, AGED 37 YEARS, R/O. EWS, 1081, 1ST FLOOR, PHASE 3, KPHB COLONY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KURNOOL 4TH TOWN POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BUGULU SREETEJA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the constitution of India by declaring the action of respondent No.5 in interfering into the civil dispute in connection with the House site property bearing plot No B7 situated in Sy.No.603 of kallur village and Mandal Kurnool District by forcing the petitioner to come for settlement with private persons as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No 5 viz Station House Officer Kurnool 4th Town Police 2 Station not to interfere into the dispute in connection with the House site property bearing plot No B7 situated in Sy. No.603 of kallur village and Mandal Kurnool District by threatening/forcing the petitioner to come for a settlement with private persons” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:01.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.22359 of 2025 Dt.01.09.2025 Asr