Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2991 (KAR)

SRI. SHIVANAND S/O SHIVAPPA HADAPAD v. SHRI. GOLALAPPGOUDA S/O SHIVARAYAGOUDA PATIL

MFA/100304/2024 · 2025-02-06

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100304 OF 2024 (MV-I) BETWEEN: SRI. SHIVANAND S/O SHIVAPPA HADAPAD, AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC. BARBER (NOW NIL), R/O: GUNJI, TQ. KHANAPUR, DIST. BELGAUM. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. UMESH C. AINAPUR, AND SMT. SUSHMA S. ANGADI, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. SHRI. GOLALAPPGOUDA S/O SHIVARAYAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O: C/O. Y.B. PATIL, PLOT NO. 155, OPP. CANARA BANK NARAYANPUR, KOPPADKERI, DHARWAD, TQ. DIST: DHARWAD. (OWNER OF MAHINDRA BOLERO VAN NO. KA-25/N-1750). 2. THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, RAMDEV GALLI, BELGAUM. (POLICY NO. 610500/31/14/6100003018 VALID FROM 24-06-2014 TO 25-06-2015) 2 3. SMT. MAHADEVI @ SAVITA W/O KALLAPPA PANCHANNAVAR, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: GANJI, TQ. KHANAPUR, DIST. BELAGAVI. 4. KUMARI VAISHNAVI D/O MANJUNATH PANCHANNAVAR, AGE: 13 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT. 5. KUMAR VARUN S/O MANJUNATH PANCHANNAVAR, AGE: 10 YEARS, OCC. SINCE MINOR, (SINCE THE PETITIONERS NO.4 AND 5 ARE MINORS, R/BY M/G MOTHER PETITIONER NO. 1) 6. SHRI. KALLAPPA S/O PARAPPA PANCHANNAVAR, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O: ANAVAL, TQ. BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOT. 7. SMT. MAHADEV W/O KALLAPPA PANCHANNAVAR, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: ANAVAL, TQ. BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOT. ... RESPONDENTS * * * * * This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Award dated 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 passed in MVC No.1474/2014 on the file of The Senior Civil Judge and Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Khanapur. This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following; 3 O R D E R Finally, Four weeks time is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the court. SD/- JUDGE //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 26.03.2025, the Advocates for appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No.100304 of 2024 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated 06.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. T By: gtb C By: sdp