'4 i APHC010428652025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY.THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGl^T TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21806 OF 2025 Between: Durga Nataraj, S/o Prabhakar, aged 48 years. Interior Designer, R/o. N. No.21, O. No.21, Flat No.4A, 4th Floor, Ragavayya Road, T Nagar, Thiyagaraya Nagar Post, Chennai, Tamil Nadu State. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District, at Tirupati. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 4. The Station House Officer, Tirumala Police Station, Tirupati District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent, threatening and harassing the petitioner by calling to the police station frequently without any fault of the petitioner and further threatening the petitioner that they would implicate in false cases as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, malafide, against to the »- violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the 4th respondent not to call the petitioner or his family members to the police station with unconnected issue or interfere with the peaceful and enjoyment of the petitioner or petitioners family personal life without fallowing due process of law. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to call the petitioner or his family members to the police station with unconnected issue or interfere with the peaceful and enjoyment of the petitionpror petitioners’ family personal life without fallowing due process of law. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SIVA NAGARJUNA SIDHADAPU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: r‘^ APHC010428652025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No.21806/2025 [3396] ^^*DURGA NATARAJ, S/0 PRABHAKAR, designer, R/O. N, no.21, O. NO.2. ...PETITIONER RAGAVAYYA ROAD, T NAGAR, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU STATE. AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. 1.THE STATE OF SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. POLICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, AT 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF TIRUPATI. 3.THE DEPUTY DISTRICT. 4.THE STATION HOUSE TIRUPATI DISTRICT. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI OFFICER, TIRUMALA POLICE STATION, ...RESPONDENT(S); Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SIVA NAGARJUNA SIDHADAPU Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: under Article 226 of Constitution of India with This Writ Petition is filed the following prayer for; “ a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent, threatening and harassing the petitioner by calling to the police station frequently without any fault threatening the petitioner that they would implicate in false cases , unjust, malafide, against to tne violation of Article 14 Constitution of India and consequently to direct the 4th as illegal, arbitrary and 21 of the <- 9 respondent not to call the petitioner or his family members to the police station with unconnected issue or interfere with the peaceful and enjoyment of the petitioner or petitioners family personal life without fallowing due process of law." 2. Sri Siva Nagarjuna Sidhadapu, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, without there being any crime registered against the Petitioner, the Petitioner was taken to the Police Station and the Police calling him to the Police Station. Learned counsel would further let there by a direction to the Police to follow due is registered against the Petitioner. are repeatedly submit that, process of law, if any crime 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition directing the Police to follow due Home would is disposed of process of law with regard to calling the Petitioner to the Police Station in case any crime is registered against him. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- K.KASI RAO ACHAR! ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OPPJfeBR To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District, at Tirupati. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirupati, Tirupati District. The Station House Officer, Tirumala Police Station, Tirupati District. One CC to Sri. Siva Nagarjuna Sidhadapu, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP For Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies. Home Department, A.P. Secretariat 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. AL HIGH COURT DATED:14/08/2025 ORDER WP NO. 21806 OF 2025 g( 1 2 SEP 2025 rrentSectiwjXw JV»| 05- DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS