Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29908 (MAD)

R PURUSHOTHAMAN v. R SENTHIL KUMAR alias SIVA and two others

A/916/2025 · 2025-02-26

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26.02.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY A.No.916 of 2025 R Purushothaman West Mambalam, Chennai - 600 032.No.A-2, Mahathi Apartment, 52/17, Jubilee Road, West Mambalam, Chennai - 600 032. ... Applicant -vs- R SENTHIL KUMAR alias SIVA and two others West Mambalam, Chennai - 600 032.No.7, Cinema Nagar, Salem 636 009. and 2 Others ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr.A.Chidambaram ********** ORDER In a proposed suit for recovery of money from the first defendant and for a permanent injunction, the intending plaintiff seeks leave to sue the first respondent before this Court. In the draft plaint, it is stated that the finance agreement dated 21.12.2022, which forms the basis of the suit, was executed at Chennai. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J rna 2. Upon examining the draft plaint and the affidavit in support of this application, it is clear that the cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction of this Court. Therefore, this application is allowed by granting leave to the applicant to sue the first respondent before this Court. As a corollary, the Registry is directed to number the suit, if otherwise in order. 26.02.2025 rna A.No.916 of 2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis