Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:125710-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19645 of 2021 Petitioner :- M/S S.R.K. Construction Company Faiq Enclave Respondent :- Director State Urban Development Agency And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rafat Raza Khan Counsel for Respondent :- Abhinav Ojha,Apurva Hajela Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Rafat Raza Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Apurva Hajela, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent nos.1, 2 and 3 to pay the amount of petitioner's firm Rs.25.01 lac with interest which is applicable as per rule which dues on respondents in connection with work orders dated 24.02.2014 in compliance of Government Order No.1964/69-1-2013-18 dated 17.02.2014." 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner's firm was awarded a contract in the year 2014 by District Urban Development Agency (D.U.D.A.), Bareilly for supplying material for construction of road and drainage. It is submitted that despite supply of material in compliance of contract awarded, as mentioned above, no amount towards material supplied by the petitioner was paid. It is submitted that Project Director, Nagar Nigam, Bareilly himself admitted in his letter dated 09.02.2021 given under Right to Information Act that certain amount is required to be paid by the District Urban Development Agency. It is also submitted that petitioner has also submitted representation to the respondent no.3 for payment of outstanding amount, but no order has been passed on the same. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents also submitted that exact amount payable to the petitioner is yet to be determined, therefore, it would be appropriate that petitioner may approach the respondent no.3 for redressal of his grievances. 5. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is disposed off directing the petitioner to move a fresh representation within a period of three weeks from today before the respondent no.3- Chairman District Urban Development Agency/District Magistrate, Bareilly to ventilate his grievance. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be decided by the respondent no.3 by reasoned and speaking order after giving due notice and opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties within a period of two months thereafter. Order Date :- 29.7.2025 Sattyarth (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J) (Saral Srivastava,J) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad