Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
04.03.2025
C528 No.185 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, learned counsel for the applicants.
2. Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned B.H. for the State.
3. Mr. Parth Tamta, learned counsel for respondent no.2.
4. Present C528 application is filed with the prayer to quash the cognizance order dated 04.01.2022, charge-sheet dated 25.07.2021 and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.91 of 2022, under Sections 498-A, 323 & 504 IPC, pending in the court of Addl. Civil Judge/ACJMJ, District Dehradun on the basis of compromise between the parties.
5. Compounding application (IA/1/2025) is also filed in the matter wherein it is prayed to compound the offence between the parties under Sections 498-A, 323 & 504 IPC.
6. Parties are present before this Court today and duly identified by their respective counsel. Parties have also filed their respective affidavits stating the above fact of compromise between them.
7. Learned State Counsel raised a preliminary objection to the effect that the offences sought to be compounded are non-compoundable.
8. However, the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of
Haryana reported in (2003) 4 S.C.C., Page 675, has permitted compounding of non-compoundable offences with the permission of Court, especially in matrimonial disputes.
9. Following the aforesaid ratio, present compounding application (IA/1/2025) is allowed. The offences between the parties are permitted to be compounded. As a result, the cognizance order dated 04.01.2022, charge-sheet dated 25.07.2021 and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.91 of 2022, under Sections 498-A, 323 & 504 IPC, pending in the court of Addl. Civil Judge/ACJMJ, District Dehradun, are hereby quashed qua the applicants.
10. C528 application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
(Alok Mahra, J.) 04.03.2025 BS