Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29891 (JHR)

VIRENDRA KUMAR ALIAS BIRENDRA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./742/2025 · 2025-02-05

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.742 of 2025 ------ Virendra Kumar @ Birendra Kumar, aged about 15 years, son of Manoj Kumar Choudhary, represented by his natural guardian/mother Savita Devi wife of Manoj Kumar Choudhary, resident of Road No.15, Jawahar Nagar, Samta Nagar, Mango, P.O. and P.S. Mango, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Dilip Kr. Karmakar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 05/02/2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Mango P.S. Case No.254 of 2024 instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109, 352 & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant-Amit Kumar. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no intention to kill anyone. It is then submitted that because of previous enmity, this false case has been foisted and the petitioner is juvenile and is student of class 8th. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-16 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., Jamshedpur in connection with Mango P.S. Case No.254 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/