APHC010429352025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22425/2025 Between: 1. VUTUKURI SUBBARAMAIAH, S/O. YOGESWARA RAO AGED 58 YEARS, OCC RETD., FROM BUSINESS R/O. FLAT NO 501, TIRUMALA ENCLAVE, KOTIA BAZAR, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENTOF POLICE, BAPATLA DISTRICT AT BAPATLA. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , CHIRALA CIRCLE CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE AND SHO, CHIRALA POLICE STATION, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 6. SRI IMMADISETTY GOPALA KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGED 41 YEARS OCC ADVOCATE, R/O MUNTHAVARI CENTER CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly of Respondents No.4 and 5 at the instance of Respondent No 6 in harassing the petitioner by calling over phone summoning to the Office of 5th Respondent and insisting him to settle the alleged amount claimed to be due by the 6th Respondent 2 by yielding to his terms and by agreeing to the alleged debt under the Civil Suit in OS No 75/2021 on the file of Honble Court of Senior Civil Judge Chirala as illegal irregular irrational without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents particularly the Respondents No 4 and 5 not to interfere in any manner with his legitimate right to defend the claim of the Respondent in the suit as well as with his personal liberty.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the PGRS application given by the respondent No.6, the petitioner was called to the police station. The police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. For ready reference, the written instructions are extracted hereunder: “Further it is humbly submitting that the contents of PGPS Petition filed by Immadisetty GopalKrishna Murthy (6th respondent) are false, hence the PGRS petition closed by submitting the fact to Superintendent of Police, Bapatla District Bapatla and a copy of report is here with enclosed. Except that, the 4th respondent or 5th respondent never insisted the petitioner to settle the matter with 6th respondent. After closing the PGRS petition 4th or 5th respondents never called the petitioner to Police Station.” 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station in the absence of any crime registered against him. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:28.08.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.22425 of 2025 Dt.28.08.2025 Asr