IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.3414 of 2024 ------ Jitendra Pandey, aged about 42 years, Son of Om Prakash Pandey, Resident of S.B. No.8, Hill View Enclave, Narayani Garden, Phase-3 Near Kamdhenu Enclave Office, Manipita Telco, P.O. & P.S.- Govindpur, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum and temporarily residing at Qr. No.60, Road No.1, Telco Colony near Suraj Petrol Pump, P.O.-Telco, P.S.-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum (Jharkhand) 831004. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Umesh Prasad Barnwal, S/o L. Barnwal, R/o-H.N. No.1, Hill View Enclave, Narayani Garden, Phase-3, Near Kamdhenu Enclave Office, Manipita Telco, P.O. & P.S.-Govindpur, Town- Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, State Jharkhand. 3. Satish Kumar Singh, S/o Ram Ekwal Singh. 4. Anita Singh W/o Satish Kumar Singh. Both 3 and 4 R/o-N/306/4, Telco Colony, P.O.-Telco Works, PS- Telco Town Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, State- Jharkhand. 5. A. Ramesh, S/o-Late M.N. Rao, R/o H.No. 192, Zone No.6, P.O.- Birsanagar, Town-Jamshedpur, P.S.-Jamshedpur, Dist.- Singhbhum East, Jharkhand. 6. Rupesh Kumar Singh, S/o Late Anil Kumar Singh, R/o Vill + P.O.-Leh, P.S.-Chatra, Dist.-Chatra, State-Jharkhand. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Chandra Shekhar Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, Addl.P.P. For the OPs : Mr. Manish Prasad Gupta, Advocate ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-28-03-2025 Heard the parties. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.2904 of 2024 to its original file; which stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 21.10.2024. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Cr.M.P. No.2904 of 2024 stood dismissed for non-compliance vide order dated 21.10.2024 for filing the requisites for service of notice upon the opposite party no.2 peremptorily within two weeks. It is next submitted that due to escape of mind, the petitioner could not file the said requisites within the stipulated time; which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.2904 of 2024 for non-compliance vide order dated 21.10.2024. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said order dated 21.10.2024 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.2904 of 2024 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.2904 of 2024 be restored to its original file. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Cr.M.P. No.2904 of 2024 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.2904 of 2024 before the concerned Bench after a week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/