Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29883 (RAJ)

M/S SHRI NARAYAN MINING AND INDUSTRIES v. SMT. HEMIKA W/O VIKRAM GURJAR

CCP/848/2024 · 2025-07-30

Anand Sharma, K R Shriram

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:29043-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 848/2024 In D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.15649/2022 M/s Shri Narayan Mining And Industries, Situated At B-222 Opposite Sitaram Park, Laxminarayanpuri, Jaipur Through Its Partner Mr. Subhash Chand Gupta. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Hemika W/o Vikram Gurjar, Residing At Dhani Sainthala Ki, Lalgarh, Ramkumarpura (Papurna), Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu. 2. Sh. Takchand S/o Sugnaram, Residing At Dhani Sainthala Ki, Lalgarh, Ramkumarpura (Papurna), Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu. 3. Sh. Ramotar Gurjar S/o Tekchand Gurjar, Residing At Dhani Sainthala Ki, Lalgarh, Ramkumarpura (Papurna), Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu. 4. Sh. Mahipal Gurjar S/o Mangejaram, Residing At Dhani Sainthala Ki Lalgarh, Ramkumarpura(Papurna), Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu. 5. Sh. Birbal S/o Prabhataram, Residing At Dhani Sainthala Ki, Lalgarh, Ramkumarpura (Papurna), Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu. 6. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Agarwal Mr. Bhaskar Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Balvendra Singh HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K.R. SHRIRAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 30/07/2025 1. Counsel for petitioner states that what remains in this petition is that cost deposited by respondents with Registrar (Judicial) of this Court has to be handed over to petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:29043-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-848/2024] 2. Counsel states that when he inquired from Registrar (Judicial), he was informed that if Court directs the amount to be paid to petitioner, it will be paid over. 3. As a background, respondents were directed to pay Rs.1,00,000/- as cost, Rs.50,000/- with Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority and Rs.50,000/- with Registrar (Judicial) of this Court in turn to be paid over to petitioner. Counsel says he only wants that Rs.50,000/- that were deposited with Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. 4. Mr. Balvendra Singh, counsel for respondents has no objection. 5. Therefore, Registrar (Judicial) is directed to handover amount of Rs.50,000/- that was deposited by respondents. This amount shall be paid within two weeks of receiving a copy of this order and cheque shall be drawn in favour of Advocate for petitioner. Copy of forwarding letter be sent to petitioner. 6. Petition closed. (ANAND SHARMA),J (K.R. SHRIRAM),CJ RAJAT/NEERU/44