Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29878 (AP)

Thota Gopalu, S/o. Govindu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep., by its

WP/18585/2016 · 2025-07-22

B S Bhanumathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010429232016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Monday, the Twenty Third Day of July, Two Thousand and Twenty Five The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S. Bhanumathi Writ Petition No.18585 of Between: Thota Gopalu, S/o. Govindu, and And The State of Andhra Pradesh and Counsel for the petitioner 1. V.R.Reddy Kovvuri Counsel for the respondent 1. Government Pleader for Forests 2. Government Pleader for Assignment (A. 3. Government for Revenue (A.P.) The Court made the following The writ petition is filed issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No seeking to take possession of the lands in an extent of Ac No.389/1; Ac.3.00 cents in Sy Ac.1.97 cents in Sy.No.389 cents in Sy.No.371-1; Ac.2 No.371-2; Ac.1.27 cents in Sy district belongs to the petitioners saying that the same ha to them by the respondents No IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Monday, the Twenty Third Day of July, Two Thousand and Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S. Bhanumathi Writ Petition No.18585 of 2016 Thota Gopalu, S/o. Govindu, and 4 others ...Petitioners f Andhra Pradesh and 6 others ...Respondents etitioners: espondents: overnment Pleader for Forests (A.P.) overnment Pleader for Assignment (A.P.) overnment for Revenue (A.P.) made the following order: is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature andamus declaring the action of the respondents No. seeking to take possession of the lands in an extent of Ac.4 00 cents in Sy 00 cents in Sy.No.389-2; Ac.0.97 cents in Sy 389-4 and Act. 2.96 cents in Sy.No.370 2.92 cents in Sy.No.376-1 and Ac.2.73 cents in Sy 27 cents in Sy.No.3721 of Atlur village and mandal istrict belongs to the petitioners saying that the same had been handed over to them by the respondents No.5 to 7 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] Monday, the Twenty Third Day of July, Two Thousand and Twenty Five Petitioners espondents under Article 226 of Constitution of India to an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature .3 and 4 in 4 00 cents in Sy. cents in Sy.No.389-3; 370-3; Ac.1.00 73 cents in Sy. andal, Y.S.R been handed over illegal and violative of the 2 BSB,J W.P.No.18585 of 2016 fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed to the petitioners under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.3 and 4 not to interfere with the rights of the petitioners over the land in an extent of Ac.4.00 cents in Sy.No.389/1; Ac.3.00 cents in Sy.No.389-2; Ac.0.97 cents in Sy.No.389-3; Ac.I.97 cents in Sy.No 389-4 and Ac.2.96 cents in Sy.No.370-3; Ac. 1.00 cents in Sy.No.371-1 & Ac. 2.92 cents in Sy.No.376-1 and Ac.2.73 cents in Sy.No.371-2 & Ac.1.27 cents in Sy No 372-1 of Atlur village and mandal, Y.S.R district without following due process of law and pass such order or orders which this Court deems fit in the interest of justice. 2. Sri Dorababu, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the relief had become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated 23.07.2025 GRL 3 BSB,J W.P.No.18585 of 2016 188 THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI W.P. No.18585 of 2016 Date: 23.07.2025 GRL