Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29866 (CHH)

NEETU LAKRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7241/2025 · 2025-07-28

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:36807 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7241 of 2025 1 - Neetu Lakra D/o Lt. Jangsai Ram, Aged About 39 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (Lb) At Government Primary School Kotagahana, Block Rajpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattigarh 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions (Dpi), Through Its Director, Indravati Bhavan, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director, Division Surguja Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector, District Balrampur, Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 29/07/2025 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 04/06/2025 (Annexure- P/1) whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Govt. Primary SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.09.23 10:38:15 +0530 2 School, Kotagahana, Block- Rajpur, Dist- Balrampur-Ramanujganj to Govt. Primary School Balangi, Block- Wadrafnagar, Dist- Balrampur- Ramnujganj under the rationalization instructions. The said transfer order was passed after declaring him surplus there. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, in objective manner, by passing the reasoned order in view of the grievance raised by the petitioner. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika