IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No. 920 of 2019 Decided on: 30.10.2025 ____________________________________________________________ Subhash Chand …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Hemant Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents- State. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Learned Counsel, on instructions, states that due to subsequent events, the relief claimed no longer survives as on day. [Statement Taken on Record]. 2. Based on the aforesaid statement, Learned Counsel for the petitioner on instructions received from the petitioner states that the present proceeding may be closed. 3. Prayer being innocuous, is not opposed by 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - Learned State Counsel also. In the above scenario, the instant petition is closed and is disposed of accordingly. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge October 30, 2025 (tm)