Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:3770] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10187/2012 Alimuddin Yapari S/o Shri Sulaiman Yapari, aged about 59 years, R/o Ward No.14, Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus
1. Indian Oil Corporation through its Chief Divisional Manager, Jaipur Division Office, Ashok Chowk, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur- 302004
2. The Selection Committee, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. for award of its Kishan Seva Kendra Dealership through its Executive Member, Jaipur Division Office, Ashok Chowk, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur- 302004
3. Sumitra Devi W/o Shri Rajendra Singh R/o Village Jaisinghpura, Post Brwasi, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan - 333045 additional to be served through the Chief Divisional Retail Sales Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Marketing Division), Jaipur Division Office, Ashok Chowk, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur 302004
4. Babulal Meena, Deputy Manager, Retail Sales Highway Sub Station, Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saransh Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Samit Bishnoi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 27/01/2025
1. By means of instant writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner while challenging the assessment of grant of marks to allot Kisan Sewa Kendra for location Birol (Jhajharia Ki Dhani), Nawalgarh to Jhazzara Road, District Jhunjhunu, has prayed to award proper ranking to petitioner in order to secure the allotment of Kisan Sewa Kendra.
[2025:RJ-JP:3770] (2 of 2) [CW-10187/2012]
2. On behalf of respondents-IOCL, a letter/ order dated 04.06.2013 (Ann-R/1/3) has been placed on record along with reply to the writ petition pointing out that the Kisan Sewa Kendra in question has been allotted in favour of one Sumitra Devi. Though, Sumitra Devi is party in the instant writ petition as respondent No.3, but the petitioner has not challenged the allotment of Kisan Sewa Kendra in her favour vide letter dated
04.06.2013.
3.
Learned counsel for petitioner after arguing the writ petition, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to assail the letter/ order dated 04.06.2013 and further proceedings in pursuance thereof.
4. No one has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.3 to oppose the prayer made by counsel for petitinoer.
5. In view of above, instant writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to assail the letter/ order dated 04.06.2013 and further proceedings thereof by the petitioner, in accordance with law.
6. Stay application and any other pending application, if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /374