CHAITU KASHYAP v. SMT. NILABATI KASHYAP AND OTHERS
CRR/950/2019 · 2025-06-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29855 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29855 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:28589
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 950 of 2019 Chaitu Kashyap S/o Kosa Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Kotwar Para,alnar, P.S. Lohandiguda, Tahsil Lohandiguda, Present Address P.W.D. Colony Gidam, Tahsil Gidam, District - South Bastar Dantewara, Chhattisgarh.
... Applicant versus 1 - Smt. Nilabati Kashyap And Others W/o Chaitu Kashyap Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Kotwar Para,alnar, P.S. And Tahsil - Lohandiguda, District - Bastar, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Bhupendra S/o Chaitu Aged About 13 Years R/o Village- Kotwar Para, Alnar, P.S. And Tahsil - Lohandiguda, District - Bastar, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Vicky S/o Chaitu Kashyap Aged About 11 Years R/o Village- Kotwar Para, Alnar, P.S. And Tahsil - Lohandiguda, District - Bastar, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Vivek S/o Chaitu Kashyap Aged About 7 Years R/o Village- Kotwar Para, Alnar, P.S. And Tahsil - Lohandiguda, District - Bastar, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Kumari Radhika D/o Chaitu Kashyap Aged About 5 Years R/o Village- Kotwar Para, Alnar, P.S. And Tahsil - Lohandiguda, District - Bastar, Chhattisgarh.
... Non-applicant For Applicant : None RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN
2 Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Order
on Board
27.06
.202
5 .
1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the applicant to press this revision on repeated calls.
2. The present revision petition has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer:-
“It is, therefore, prayed that, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this revision and modified the impugned order dated 25.06.2019 passed by the learned family court Bastar at Jagdalpur, District Bastar C.G. by deducting the maintenance order or to set aside the aforesaid
order , in the interest of justice.”
3. It appears that with the passage of time, the applicant has lost interest in pursuing this matter.
4. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed on this ground alone. Interim relief if any stands vacated.
5. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the trial Court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance.
Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan