APHC010427212024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION N BETWEEN: 1. MYSORE NARIGAMMA DEVALAYAM COMMITTEE, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, B.GOPAL S/O B.NAGANNA R/O. D.NO. 6-143, AZAD NAGAR, KALYANDURGAM ROAD, ANANTAPURAMU TOWN AND DISTRICT 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANATAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANATAPURAMU, ANANATAPURAMU DISTRICT. 4. THE THASILDAR, ANANA ANANATAPURAMU DISTRICT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 21736/2024 MYSORE NARIGAMMA DEVALAYAM COMMITTEE, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, B.GOPAL S/O B.NAGANNA R/O. 143, AZAD NAGAR, KALYANDURGAM ROAD, ANANTAPURAMU TOWN AND DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANATAPURAMU THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANATAPURAMU, ANANATAPURAMU DISTRICT. THE THASILDAR, ANANATAPURAMU, ANANATAPURAMU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3330] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO MYSORE NARIGAMMA DEVALAYAM COMMITTEE, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, B.GOPAL S/O B.NAGANNA R/O. 143, AZAD NAGAR, KALYANDURGAM ROAD, ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANATAPURAMU THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TAPURAMU, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the mandamus or any 2 other appropriate writ or direction declaring the unilateral action of the 2nd 4th respondents in issuing the Dt 02.08.2024,R.Dis.No.E2/457/2023proceedings Rc. No. D1 LA/1255/2022 Dt.25.06.2022 and Rc.No.B/380/2022 dt vide 11.11.2022, without issuing a show cause notice, giving an a opportunity to the petitioner to submit explanation/objections and without making petitioner as a party to the proceedings, furnishing the order copy to the petitioner and consequential action of the 4th respondent in issuing a Notice vide Rc.No.83/2023/A Dt 30.08.2024 to the petitioner society for immediate relocation of the Narigamma Temple situated in Sy.No.116 of Kakkalapalli village, Basavatarak Nagar, Kalyandurgam Road, Anantapuramu Town and District and subsequently threatening to demolish the temple immediately, as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the constitution and provisions of National Highways Act and consequently set-aside the above proceedings issued by the 2nd , 3rd 4th Respondents and the consequential Notice vide Rc.No.83/2023/A Dt30.08.2024 issued by 4th Respondent and pass such other order or orders. IA No. 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead the proposed Respondent as Respondent No.5 in the above W.P.No. 21736 of 2024 and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SRAVAN KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: After arguing some time, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court for withdrawal of the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawan. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 05.08.2025 Harin 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO 89 W.P.No. 21736 OF 2014 Date: 05-08-2025 Harin