Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29850 (KAR)

M/S PRIANKA GRAPHICS PVT LTD v. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD

WP/17966/2022 · 2025-06-06

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19294 WP No. 17966 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 17966 OF 2022 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. M/S PRIANKA GRAPHICS PVT LTD M-6, 6TH CROSS, 1ST STAGE, BEHIND SHAMRAO VITTAL BANK PEENYA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, BENGALURU-560 058 REPRESENTED BY SPA HOLDER SRI MANISH MADNANI S/O THANWAR DAS MADANI AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, GENERAL MANAGER M/S PRIANKA GRAPHICS PVT LTD … PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. PRASAD HEGDE., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD (A GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA UNDERTAKING) NO.49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, KHANIJA BHAVAN RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19294 WP No. 17966 of 2022 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.B. MOUNESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS FROM THE OFFICE OF THE RESPONDENT WHICH ULTIMATELY RESULTED IN PASSING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 25.06.2018 MADE IN KIADB/HO/ALLOT/19607/ 4718/2018-19 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal reading as hereunder: "In the above writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order at Annexure-A dated 25.06.2018. However, now the respondent granted time for implementation of the project by communication dated 07.05.2025 subject to payment of penalty of a sum of Rs.32,48,326/- and withdrawal of the above writ petition. The petitioner has already paid the said penalty. Hence the above writ petition may be dismissed - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19294 WP No. 17966 of 2022 as withdrawn having become infructuous in the interest of justice and equity." The memo is taken on record. In light of the same, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE NP