I'-r ¥ APHC010427382025 OPA/V IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) op4 T \ TUESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 21847 OF 2025 Between: Smt Karreddula Shakunthala, W/o late Rama Mohan, Aged 68 years Occupation Farming, Resident of Vruksha Nagar, Stuvartupram, Bapatia West (Rural) Guntur, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat velagapude, Amaravati. 2. The Tahsildar, Rampachodavaram Mandalam, Rampachodavaram, Alluri Sitharama Raju district, Andhra Pradesh. 3. Chundam Tammana Dora, S/o Chellana Dora, Resident of B Velama Kota, Rampachodavaram Mandalam, Sitharama Raju district, Andhra Pradesh. Rampachodavaram, Alluri 4. Chundam Rammanna Dora, S/o Chellana Dora, Resident of B Velama Kota, Rampachodavaram Mandalam, Rampachodavaram, Sitharama Raju district, Andhra Pradesh. Alluri 5. Chundam Papa Rao Dora, S/o Chellana Dora, Resident of B Veiama Kota, Rampachodavaram Mandalam, Sitharama Raju district, Andhra Pradesh. Rampachodavaram, Ailuri ...Respondents . Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction declaring the actions of respondent no. 2 in issuing the notice dated 26-07-2025 against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, and in violation of the principles of natural justice, as well as a violation of the fundamental rights of the Petitioner under Articles 14, 19, 20, and 21 of the Constitution of India, 1950. Consequently, it is requested that the respondent no 2 be directed to refrain from proceeding with the notice dated 26-07-2025 and to withdraw the said notice issued against the petitioners. Additionally, the parties involved in the alleged notice dated 26-07-2025 should be directed to seek resolution through the competent civil court. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance to alleged notice issued by the 2nd respondent dt. 26.07.2025including appearance of the petitioners 1 and 2 before the Tahsildar Rampachodavaram Rampachodavaram, ASR Distract pending disposal of the present WRIT Petition. Mandalam Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SATHUPATI PREM Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: 'V iSi APHC010427382025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY. THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 21847/2025 Between: 1.KARREDDULA SHAKUNTHALA, W/0 LATE RAMA MOHAN, AGED 68 YEARS OCCUPATION FARMING, RESIDENT OF VRUKSHA NAGAR, STUVARTUPRAM, BAPATIA WEST (RURAL) GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARIAT SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDE, AMARAVATI. RAMPACHODAVARAM MANDALAM TAHSILDAR 2.THE RAMPACHODAVARAM, ALLURI SITHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.CHUNDAM TAMMANA DORA, S/0 CHELLANA DORA,3. RESIDENT OF B VELAMA KOTA, RAMPACHODAVARAM MANDALAM, RAMPACHODAVARAM, ALLURI SITHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4.CHUNDAM RAMMANNA DORA, S/0 CHELLANA DORA,4. RESIDENT OF B VELAMA KOTA, RAMPACHODAVARAM MANDALAM, RAMPACHODAVARAM. ALLURI SITHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5.CHUNDAM PAPA RAO DORA. , S/O CHELLANA DORA, RESIDENT OF B VEIAMA KOTA, RAMPACHODAVARAM MANDALAM, RAMPACHODAVARAM, AILURI SITHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction declaring the actions of respondent no. 2 in issuing the notice dated 26-07-2025 against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, and in violation of the principles of natural justice, as well as a violation of the fundamentalrights of the Petitioner under Articles 14, 19, 20, and 21 of the Constitution of India, 1950. Consequently, it is requested that the respondent no 2 be directed to refrain from proceeding with the notice dated 26-07-2025 and to withdraw the said notice issued against the petitioners. Additionally, the parties involved in the alleged notice dated 26-07-2025 should be directed to seek resolution through the competent civil court. It is further requested that this Hon'ble Court pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance to alleged notice issued by the 2nd respondent dt. 26.07.2025including appearance of the petitioners 1 Tahsildar, Rampachodavaram Mandalam, Rampachodavaram, ASR Distrct pending disposal of the present WRIT Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner; and 2 before the 1.SATHUPATI PREM Counsel for the Respondent{S); 1.GPFOR REVENUE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.21847 of 2025 ORDER:- The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “...issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction declaring the actions of respondent no. 2 in issuing the notice dated 26-07-2025 against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, and in violation of the principles of natural justice, as well as a violation of the fundamental rights of the Petitioner under Articles 14, 19, 20, and 21 of the Constitution of India, 1950. Consequently, it is requested that the respondent no 2 be directed to refrain from proceeding with the notice dated 26-07-2025 and to withdraw the said notice issued against the petitioners. Additionally, the parties involved in the alleged notice dated 26-07-2025 should be directed to seek .resolution through the competent civil court. It is further requested that this Hon’ble Court pass such other order or orders...” The Tahsildar-respondent No.2, by impugned notice dated 26.07.2025, directed the petitioner herein to attend for an inquiry on 02.08.2025, basing on the application filed by the unofficial respondents, along with records. 2. It is the argument of learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had personally appeared before the respondent No.2 and thereby the respondent No.2 informed the petitioner that the matter was referred to the 3. Sub-Collector. When this Court posed a question about the maintainability of the writ 4. petition, there is no response from the learned counsel for the petitioner. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to offer an explanation to the notice issued dated 26.07.2025 within two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. On receipt of the explanation from the petitioner, respondent No.2 - Tashsildar is same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with are directed to maintain status directed to examine the law. Till such time, the respondents quo existing as on today. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be to costs. no order as As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAIM/VIA assistant REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Illy" section officer To, 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat velagapude Amaravati. 2. The Tahsildar Rampachodavaram Mandalam Alluri Sitharama Raju district, Andhra Pradesh. 3. One CC to Sri. Sathupati Prem Advocate 4. Two CCS to GP for Revenue High Court 5. Two CD Copies Rampachodavaram, [OPUC] of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] GSC .V'v''’ dk HIGH COURT DATED: 19/08/2025 ORDER WP NO. 21847 OF 2025 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS