SOHIL KHAN ALIAS LADEN S/O SHRI MUSTAQ AHMED v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11576/2025 · 2025-09-20
Anil Kumar Upman
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29848 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29848 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:38890] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11576/2025 Sohil Khan Alias Laden S/o Shri Mustaq Ahmed, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Dodya Mahanandpur, Police Station Piloda, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Accused Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Himanshi Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Assistant GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 20/09/2025
1. The instant bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.253/2024 registered at Police Station Sadar Gangapur City, District Gangapur City for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 140(3), 3(5) & 308(2) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that other co-accused persons namely Najim Khan, Abhishek & Azad Ahmed have already been granted benefit of bail by this court as well as co-ordinate bench of this court. Charge- sheet has been filed in this matter. Petitioner is in custody since 19.07.2025 & trial of the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:38890] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11576/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. He submits that two other cases have been registered against the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that aforementioned co- accused persons have been granted bail by this court as well as co-ordinate bench of this court; trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Sohil Khan Alias Laden S/o Shri Mustaq Ahmed shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /40