SHRI P.SHEIK OLI DECEASED v. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER
TCA/186/2012 · 2025-01-10
Anita Sumanth, G Arul Murugan
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29848 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29848 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:MHC:123 T.C.A.No.186 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.01.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN T.C.A.No.186 of 2012 P. Sheik Oli (deceased) 1.P.Abidha Banu 2.P.Beer Saleem 3.P.Beer Yasif 4.Minor P.Beer Anif 5.Minor P.Beer Sameem 6.Minor P.Beer Sabana Banu 7.Mohammed Beevi .. Appellants vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward IX (4), Chennai. .. Respondent Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench 'B' dated 11.08.2011 in ITA No. 1427/Mds/2005. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.J.Narayanasamy Senior Standing Counsel 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.186 of 2012 DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J. and G. ARUL MURUGAN.,J
JUDGMENT (Delivered by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J)
Learned counsel for the appellant had reported no instructions in the matter on 12.12.2024. We hence directed the Registry to issue notice directly to the appellant.
2. The following service report is placed on file:
“Notice were returned unserved. On enquiries being made by me in the said address and it is reported that the said appellants gone out of country and it is returnable date is not known. Hence notice were returned unserved. Dated this 9th Jan 2025 Sd/- Sd/- Nazir Bailiff”
3. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this Tax Case (Appeal) is dismissed returning the substantial questions of law unanswered. No costs.
[A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J] sl
10.01.2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes To The Income Tax Officer, Ward IX (4),Chennai. T.C.A.No.186 of 2012 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis