Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29841 (RAJ)

RAJENDRA KUMAR JAT S/O SHRI JITMAL JAT v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/14616/2025 · 2025-09-24

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39350] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14616/2025 Rajendra Kumar Jat S/o Shri Jitmal Jat, Aged About 27 Years, R/ o Village Shivpura, Post Hukampura, Tehsil Phooliya Kalan, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Primary Education Department, Bikaner. 3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghu Nandan Shrma with Ms. Kritika Rajawat For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 24/09/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner submitted his application form pursuant to advertisement dated 16.12.2022 for recruitment on the post of Primary School Teacher, Grade-III Level 1st, in the category of specially abled person (Locomotive Disability). He also submitted a disability certificate revealing that the petitioner is having amputation in his right hand and thus, his disability was assessed at more than 40%, and on the basis of such certificate, possessing bench mark disability as per the rules, and on being selected and [2025:RJ-JP:39350] (2 of 2) [CW-14616/2025] securing a suitable place in the merit list, he is entitled for an appointment. Yet, the respondents again asked the petitioner to undergo a medical examination before the Medical Board constituted in SMS Hospital, Jaipur. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after such re-examination by the Medical Board, no certificate or document was issued. However, it was verbally informed to the petitioner that his disability has been assessed less than 35%. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is still ready to undergo another medical examination, which may be conducted by the expert doctors of AIIMS, and he would abide by the result of such examination report. In the light of above, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with the direction to the respondent No.1 to constitute a fresh Medical Board comprising of experts from AIIMS, Jodhpur, who shall examine and send report after assessing percentage of disability sustained by the petitioner, and in further action in respect of petitioner shall be taken by the respondents in accordance with law after receiving report of such fresh Medical Board. Necessary exercise is directed to be done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The petitioner is also directed to deposit Rs.10,000/- as expenses for constitution of fresh Medical Board. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/37