APHC010428432025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21903/2025 Between: 1. ANUSURI SUBBA LAKSHMI, W/OLATE. RAMA RAO, AGE ABOUT 51 YEARS R/O D.NO 3-187/2, NERELLAMMA COLONY, INDHRAPALEM, KAKINADA MANDAL, KAKINADA DIST. 2. ANUSURI SIVA VENKATARAMANA, S/O LATE. RAMA RAO, AGE ABOUT YEARS R/O D.NO 3-187/2, NERELLAMMA COLONY, INDHRAPALEM, KAKINADA MANDAL, KAKINADA DIST. 3. MEDISETTI DURGA MAHALAKSHMI, W/O MEDISETTI N. BHASKARARAO AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O D.NO. 4-58/1 RAMALAYAM STREET, CHINNATALLAPOLAM, JAGANNAIKULAPALEM, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, DR.B.R.AMBEDKARKONASEEMA DT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE MANGALAGIRI, HEAD QUARTER,MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA DISTRICT,KAKINADA. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SAMALKOTA POLICE STATION, 2 SAMALKOTAMANDAL,KAKINADADISTRICT. 5. VITTANALA SURYA KUMARI, D/O LATE.VEERRAJU AGED ABOUT MAJOR,INDRAPALEM, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring to declaring the high handed action on the part of the respondents herein more particularly 4th respondent station House officer deliberately interfering the civil disputes between the petitioners and unofficial respondent by calling the petitioners to the police station and throating them to cancel the settlement deed dt 3-8-2024 in the property an extent of 120.27 Sq.Ya in Survey No 39/7 with residential house D.No 1-6/1 situated at Suryanagar Peta, Indrapalem Village Kakinada Rural and settle in favour of the unofficial respondent is highlly illegal arbitrary and contrary to the guidelines and judgements of the APEX courts apart from violation of article 14,16,21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and consequentially to direct the respondents more particularly 4th respondent station House Officer not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioners and unofficial respondent an extent of 120.27 Sq.Ya in Survey NO 39/7 with residential house D. No 1-6/1 situated at Suryanagar Peta, Indrapalem Village Kakinada Rural including not to calling the petitioners to police station by threating and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents more particularly 4th respondent station House Officer not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioners and unoffial respondent an extent of 120.27 Sq.Ya in Survey NO: 39/7 with residential house D.No: 1-6/1 situated at Suryanagar Peta, Indrapalem Village Kakinada Rural including not to calling the pettioners to police station by throating and to pass pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 3 1. SAMEERA BOKKA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21903 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring to declaring the high handed action on the part of the respondents herein more particularly 4th respondent station House officer deliberately interfering the civil disputes between the petitioners and unofficial respondent by calling the petitioners to the police station and threatening them to cancel the settlement deed dt 3-8-2024 in the property an extent of 120.27 Sq.Yds in Survey No 39/7 with residential house D.No.1-6/1 situated at Suryanagar Peta, Indrapalem Village Kakinada Rural and settle in favour of the unofficial respondent is highly illegal arbitrary and contrary to the guidelines and judgments of the APEX courts apart from violation of article 14,16,21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and consequentially to direct the respondents more particularly 4th respondent station House Officer not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioners and unofficial respondent an extent of 120.27 Sq.Ya in Survey NO 39/7 with residential house D. No 1- 6/1 situated at Suryanagar Peta, Indrapalem Village Kakinada Rural including not to calling the petitioners to police station by threatening and to pass…” 2. None represented for the petitioners. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that basing on the representation of the respondent No.5, the petitioners were called to the police station and enquired into the matter and no crime has been registered so far against the petitioners. 5 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station in absence of any crime registered against the petitioners. The police are further directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 19.08.2025. UPS 6 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.21903 of 2025 Dated.19.08.2025 UPS 133 7