[2025:RJ-JP:35801-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 334/2025 Karan Yadav Son Of Ramsingh Yadav, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Mohanpura, Jalsu, Amer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan- 303701. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Deputy Commissioner Of Police (West), Jaipur. 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Kalwar (West), Jaipur. 5. Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur Rural. 6. Station House Officer, Police Station Kaladera, District Jaipur Rural. 7. Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur Rural. 8. Station House Officer, Police Station Renwal Kishangarh, District Jaipur. 9. Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur. 10. Ratan Lal Yadav Son Of Late Shri Chothmal, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Talaiwali Dhani, Khedi Milk, Post Karansar, Tehsil Renwal (Kishangarh) District Jaipur. 11. Nanchhi Devi Wife Of Ratan Lal, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Talaiwali Dhani, Khedi Milk, Post Karansar, Tehsil Renwal (Kishangarh) District Jaipur. 12. Ramdhan Yadav Son Of Late Shri Ramnarayan, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Gram Post Lalpura, Lochno Ki Dhani, Tehil Kalwar, Police Station Kalwar, Jaipur West (Raj.). 13. Gordhan Yadav Son Of Late Shri Ramnarayan, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Gram Post Lalpura, Lochno Ki Dhani, Tehil Kalwar, Police Station Kalwar, Jaipur West (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv Ji Ram Jat Mr. Ashok Samoda [2025:RJ-JP:35801-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-334/2025] For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 08/09/2025 1. This habeas corpus petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner with regard to illegal detention of the corpus. 2. We have perused the record. 3. We have considered that corpus is major and the fact that no FIR has been lodged by the petitioner against the persons who have detained the corpus. 4. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. 5. The habeas corpus petition is dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J PAYAL DHAWAN /176