KONDREDDI VAMSI KRISHNA v. SRI T PRAVEEN KUAMR (Discharged)
CC/3830/2024 · 2025-04-07
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29837 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29837 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010428282024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3830/2024 Between:
1. KONDREDDI VAMSI KRISHNA, S/O LATE K. PRABHAKARA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE, H.NO.8/54-1, KUMMARI STREET, GUDUR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT PRESENTLY RESIDING AT H.NO.4-6-90/15/2/1/B, TEJASWI NAGAR, ATTAPUR, HYDERABAD - 500 048. ...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI T PRAVEEN KUAMR DISCHARGED, OCC TAHSILDAR, O/O MRO OFFICE SYDAPURAM MANDAL, SYDAPURAM , SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT R 1 DISCHARGED AS PER COURT ORDER DT.17.02.2025. VIDE IA NO.2 OF 2025. IN CC NO.3830 OF 2024
2. SMT RAMADEVI, OCC TAHSILDAR, O O MANDAL REVENUE OFFICE, SYDAPURAM MANDAL, SYDAPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICRT. R 2 IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DT.17.02.2025. VIDE IA NO.1 OF 2025. IN CC NO.3830 OF 2024. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent under Sec. 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 for the willful disobedience in complying this Honble court order passed in W.P.No. 16385 of 2024 dated 31.07.2024, and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the proposed 2nd respondent as respondent no. 2 in C.C.No.3830 of 2024 in W.P.No. 16385 of 2024, IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to discharge Petitioner/ Respondent from the present Contempt Case No.3830 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P MALLIKHARJUNA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. Y BALAJI The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri P.Mallikharjuna Rao, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri Sk.Abdul Rasheed, learned Counsel representing Sri Y.Balaji, learned Counsel for the Respondent. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner in the present Contempt Case seeks to withdraw this Contempt Case. 3. Request granted. 4. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is dismissed as withdrawn. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this Order.
__________________________ G.RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 07.04.2025 SRT
69
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
C.C.No.3830 of 2024
Date: 07.04.2025
SRT