Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29834 (RAJ)

NITIN SAINI S/O SHRI SURENDRA SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11527/2025 · 2025-09-19

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:38629] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11527/2025 1. Nitin Saini S/o Shri Surendra Saini, R/o House No-10, Ustad Ji Ki Bagichi M.d. Road, Police Thana Sms, Jaipur. 2. Jatin Meena @ Babu S/o Shri Shankarlal, R/o House No- 6, Gali No.-3, M.d. Road Police Thana Sms, Jaipur. 3. Vijendra Sonkar @ Vikki S/o Shri Ramsharan Sonkar, R/o C-45, Gurunanakpura Rajapark, Adarsh Nagar, Police Thana Moti Dungri, Jaipur. (The Accused Presently In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 19/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.544/2025 registered at Police Station Shipra Path, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) under Sections 140(2), 309(4), 308(2), 115(2), 126(2) and 189(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that it is alleged against the petitioner that they kidnapped the complainant on 22.08.2025 and demanded ransom, it is mentioned in the FIR that complainant's associate Ramkesh [2025:RJ-JP:38629] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11527/2025] and Ankit were also present at the place of occurrence, however, they did not lodge any FIR about kidnapping of the complainant. It is also alleged in the FIR that the petitioners assaulted the complainant but no medical examination was conducted. The petitioners have falsely been implicated, as co-accused Ajay was demanding his money from the complainant Vinayak Kushwah. The accused-petitioners are in custody since 25.08.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and contended that the petitioners along with the other co-accused kidnapped the complainant Vinayak and thereafter demanded ransom, therefore, considering the above facts, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and looking to the fact that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 25.08.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Nitin Saini S/o Shri Surendra Saini, 2. Jatin Meena @ Babu S/o Shri Shankarlal and 3. Vijendra Sonkar @ Vikki S/o Shri Ramsharan Sonkar, in connection with FIR No.544/2025 registered at Police Station Shipra Path, District Jaipur City [2025:RJ-JP:38629] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11527/2025] (South), shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/130