1 2025:CGHC:24284 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5194 of 2018 • Tarachand Jaiswal S/o Shri Kashiram Jaiswal, Aged About 69 Years R/o Village - Pendri Talab - Post - Tehsil And P.S. Lormi, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Agriculture And Animal Husbandry, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Director Veterinary Medical Services, Directorate Of Veterinary Medical Services, G.E. Road, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Joint Director, Veterinary Medical Services, Composite Building, Near Collectorate, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4. Joint Director, Treasury, Account And Pension, Composite Building, Near Collectorate, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Pawan Shrivastava, Advocate For State : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 16/06/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- 10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records relating to the case of the Petitioner. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus and direct the Respondents to release the entire gratuity amount of petitioner with 12% interest rate per annum within a period of one month. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 10.3 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus and direct the Respondents to finalize monthly pension of petitioner within a period of one month. 10.4 That, the Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus and direct the Respondents to pay 12% interest rate per annum on amount of 51,000/- which was recovered earlier and the same was paid to the petitioner after 26.05.2017. 10.5 Any other relief which Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and cost of the petition. 2. At the very outset, Mr. Pawan Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to revive if cause of action arises. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Permission granted. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty stated above. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti