Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29832 (RAJ)

S.I.G. MULTITRADES AND ASSOCIATION v. THAKUR MAANDATA SINGH (MOBILE NO. 9887095779)

CMA/2060/2021 · 2025-04-30

Avneesh Jhingan, Bhuwan Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18147-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2060/2021 S.I.G. Multitrades And Association, Registered Office At 106, Tarashankar Pearl Age, -52, Arvind Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur Through Partner Sanjay Kumar Bajaj S/o Late Shri Omprakash Bajaj, Aged About 50 Years, Currently Residing At Bajaj Bhawan Tokobari Road, Guwahati-781001, District Kamrup Metro (Assam) Mobile No. 9678151000 ----Appellant Versus 1. Thakur Maandata Singh (Mobile No. 9887095779), Legal Heirs Of Late Smt Kiran Kumari W/o Late Shri Vikram Singh S/o Late Shri Vikramsingh And Kiran Kumari, R/o Plot No. 80, Krishna Colony Naya Kheda, Ambabadi, Jaipur 2. Thakur Amardeep Singh (9829906663), Legal Heirs Of Late Smt Kiran Kumari W/o Late Shri Vikram Singh S/o Late Shri Vikramsingh And Kiran Kumari, R/o Plot No. 80, Krishna Colony Naya Kheda, Ambabadi, Jaipur ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Ms. Pragya Seth for Mr. Vigyan Shah For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 30/04/2025 1. This appeal was filed in the year 2021 aggrieved of dismissal of application under section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 2. Counsel for the appellant fairly submits that arbitrator was appointed in the year 2024. [2025:RJ-JP:18147-DB] (2 of 2) [CMA-2060/2021] 3. Counsel for the appellant has no instructions with regard to status of the arbitration proceedings. 4. Considering that the arbitrator has already been appointed, the appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellant to move an application under Section 17 of the Act, in case, if need so arises. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Anu /40