P-1-CA-10627-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10627 OF 2025 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10523 OF 2025 SATISH NAVNATH ROHAM VERSUS GORAKH RAOSAHEB KALE & OTHERS .… Mr. N. D. Sonavane, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. P. D. Patil, AGP for the Respondent – State .… CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 06.10.2025 PER COURT :- 1. The motion is made for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 26.09.2025 passed in Civil Application No.10627 of 2025 with Writ Petition No.10523 of 2025. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that inadvertently, prayer clause “B” is allowed in Civil Application No.10627 of 2025, instead of prayer clause “A”. 3. In view of the above, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “A”. Necessary corrections be carried out. 4. The motion for speaking to the minutes is disposed of. [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ] SMS 1 of 1 2025:BHC-AUG:26651 This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //